Look Who it Was Random video

FBI Underpants bomber fraud: US lawyer Kurt Haskell on mistrial, misreporting & torture

304 views · Published 24 January 2015 · 11:51 · Indexed 26 October 2026

Channel: Public Enquiry · 2015 · News & Politics

Watch on YouTube

Poor FBI Mafia victim Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab

Interview with Kurt Haskell, American Lawyer, who witnessed the 'Underpants Bomber' being let on an airliner by 'an Indian looking man' from Amsterdam Schiphol airport to Detroit without a passport – he has since looked into this and come to the conclusion this was a false flag terrorist event. Can no longer trust the media; Death of Saudi Arabian King Fahd – 1914 Treaty of Darin. Sunday's Greek election and Syriza party.

23. The Congressional testimony of Michael Leiter indicated that the U.S. Government frequently lets terrorists into the U.S.
24. In early 2010, a Mr. Wolf appeared on the Keith Olberman Show and indicated that the Obama administration was looking into the possibility that this was an intentional plot by a U.S. intelligence agency.
25. Watch the Congressional testimony of Patrick Kennedy (available on the internet) and watch how he does vocabulary gymnastics to avoid saying that this was an intentional plot by U.S. intelligence.
26. Dutch military police initially indicated that Umar did not go through normal security measures. This was only reported once.
27. Why did a passenger call me in early January 2010 and attempt to convince me that I did not see Umar being escorted around security, but I instead witnessed a minor child being taken through security. This was untrue. I later found out that such passenger works for a contractor that receives a great deal of business from the Department of Defense.
28. Why does the mainstream media continue to not investigate this story and continue to not report my eyewitness account?
29. A second passenger contacted me and confirmed my acount of the Sharp Dressed Man. She is scared and refuses to come forward.
30. Why have nearly all of the passengers refused to talk about this case?
31. Why were a great deal of the passengers, military personnel, government workers and government contractors?
32. Why did the prosecution indicate at a recent hearing that it was still withholding some evidence that was deemed to be secret (top seret?). What could be so secret if the government was not involved in the plot?
33. Why has the online Detroit Free Press site erased all underwear bomber articles that support my theory on the case, but retained older articles that support the official story?


http://haskellfamily.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/colossal-deceit-known-as-underwear.html

More from this channel