Commentary: Cassie Jaye Interviewed in Australia on The Red Pill Movie. It Does Not Go Well
2,648 views · Published 13 June 2017 · 9:01 · Indexed 1 November 2026
Channel: Dr. Ginger Hamster · 2017 · People & Blogs
So, two brilliant examples of 'journalists' in Australia interview Cassie Jaye, the filmmaker behind The Red Pill Movie...they didn't see the movie, they didn't even bother watching the copy sent to them by Jaye HERSELF before the interview. Let's just say Cassie has the patience of a saint and if you watch the interview, even her patience began to crack a little with the final scene showing Jaye with a 'I can't believe this' sort of smirk on her face. It's classic. The movie is greeted with protests, screenings being cancelled and so on by...anyone? Feminists of course. Why? I offer my take on why and it's very simple; the narrative of feminism states that women are always oppressed and men are always the oppressors. If the messages from the movie (I have not seen it yet) are made wide spread, and people in general discover that YES, men indeed have problems that are rarely talked about, it weakens the feminist narrative the all men are oppressors and all men are privileged. And feminists CANNOT have that information spread around. And of course, Jaye was a feminist and now has 'strayed off the reservation' with this movie. And we all know how someone formerly of the 'hive mind' is treated by feminists when they do that. Original Interview https://au.tv.yahoo.com/sunrise/video/watch/35888333/mens-rights-film-banned-in-australia/#page6 Bearing's Videos https://youtu.be/WDGm9Y-91i4 https://youtu.be/MvBqt1Eotm0 Cassie Jaye's Video Post on the Interview https://youtu.be/xvLsslFEv7k Bane666au Video https://youtu.be/TNPS2axEE6A Independent Man https://youtu.be/J0titJV8No4 Australian Domestic Violence Article http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/story-of-domestic-violence-against-men-is-hidden-complicated-and-disputed-20151122-gl55v7.html Subscribe! Like! Twit Me! @jamesvonmaxwell @DrGingerHamster on minds.com Original Content Copyright 2017 James Maxwell All Rights Reserved Fair Use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include: the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; the nature of the copyrighted work; the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
More from this channel
-
8:11
Feminism: Yoga Free Bleeding and Free Tampons. You Go GRRRL!
-
10:18
Commentary: Bill Nye: An Infinite Spectrum of Embarrassment
-
9:27
Portlandia: Out of Control SJWs Get a Taco Truck Closed Down for Cultural Appropriation
-
14:03
The Patriarchy: Forces Poor Helpless Women to Take Crappy College Majors and Borrow Money
-
7:32
Hamster's Pissed: Neon Fiona, IT'S NOT YOUR BUSINESS WHO I DATE!
-
9:18
Amherst College: Woman Sexually Assaults Man, HE Gets Kicked Out of College
-
16:45
Commentary: Claire Terrio: The Feminist Indoctrination Starts Very Early
-
11:05
Hamster: By the Numbers: The Clery Act and College Sexual Assault. Why are They Lying?