Look Who it Was Random video

Webster Tarpley on Wood & Reynolds Qui Tam

1,470 views · Published 20 June 2011 · 5:14 · Indexed 17 October 2026

Channel: checktheevidence · 2011 · Science & Technology

Watch on YouTube

This was filmed in Bradford in 2007.

A shame he had not studied the evidence ...

http://tinyurl.com/911qtam   http://tinyurl.com/911ftb   
http://www.checktheevidence.com/

Here is what Webster Tarpley said: 
============
I believe that research should be carried out -- you cannot ban any research a priori. I've always argued for a research sphere separated from a political sphere -- and what I think of as the political sphere is what we've seen [in his presentation] it has to with for example using 9/11 and the Rogue B52 to get impeachment going -- because without 9/11 truth, you cannot defeat Bush politically. So I am always in favour of a political sphere which is separate from a research sphere. For a lot of people in the United States, the research sphere is all there is...

What do you think of the Directed Energy Weapons scenario?

Hang on I am getting to it, but the political sphere for me is indispensable. Now, I would never say I won't co-operate with someone because they have a theoretical difference from me. I don't think it's possible to talk about "men from mars". I don't recommend blaming it on the action of the holy spirit -- much as I like the Holy Spirit  -but short of this, I would not have any preclusion. Concerning her theory, I think her theory is something she has failed to prove. I don't see her successfully proving the "beam" theory and I like Fetzer very much and I try to co-operate with Fetzer on political matters, but I have not been convinced by the Space Laser or Beam Weapons or new Physical Principles argument. So, I think it's fine for them to continue with this but you have to realise that this is an unproven hypothesis. I think it is not wise if they get a chance to be on television to make that the leading edge. I would not do that....

More from this channel