Look Who it Was Random video

IN RE ROBERT ALLEN RYTLEWSKI

3,083 views · Published 26 April 2016 · 1:45:32 · Indexed 18 October 2026

Channel: RobbbRyder · 2016 · People & Blogs

Watch on YouTube

Wow.. the official form (Standard Form 61 Appointment Affidavits) has a fatal flaw in its “style”, making it unsuitable for use as evidence of having complied with the Laws of the United States requiring all federal officers to have sworn and subscribed the Oath of Office found in Title 5 USC §3331. 

This would mean that these officers are currently unconstitutionally appointed, and unless the defect is corrected upon notice, they would be considered warring with the constitution. 

However even without notice, their official records evidence they are not properly appointed de jure officers of the United States, and cannot execute and enforce the Laws of the United States. 

That pisses off “The United States of America” on its behalf I have filed a Qui Tam Criminal Complaint with the Director of the Administration Office of the United States Courts. 

That was before realizing we may not be taking advantage of the attorney hired  for our use ie: a staff attorney also called a pro se law clerk…. As they should be able to take judicial notice of adjudicative facts and officer procedural advice on filing “into the court” 

It is my belief we need to have the “Courts Seal” on our pleadings and exhibits… not just a Clerks Stamp…  Courts of record.. have Seals… and indicates that the item has been entered into the court record…  we just hardly ever see it.. (but if you watch enough of the video.. you will )… 

Finally IN RE ROBERT ALLEN RYTLEWSKI is a involuntary bankruptcy proceeding.. (in my opinion).. and I’ll show you why…. And what action I am using in an attempt to secure a remedy.

More from this channel