American National VS. U.S. Citizens/Subjects/ to The Corporate United States pt 2
4,444 views · Published 9 November 2018 · 1:32:32 · Indexed 23 October 2026
Channel: KAHANTAZADAQ "The Trials of Life." · 2018 · People & Blogs
347-618-1783 [email protected] Scott was a slave whose owner, an army doctor, had spent time in Illinois, a free state, and Wisconsin, a free territory at the time of Scott’s residence. The Supreme Court was stacked in favor of the slave states. Five of the nine justices were from the South while another, Robert Grier of Pennsylvania, was staunchly pro-slavery. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote the majority decision, which was issued on March 6, 1857. The court held that Scott was not free based on his residence( thing identified) in either Illinois or Wisconsin because he was not considered a person under the U.S. Constitution–in the opinion of the justices, black people were not considered citizens when the Constitution was drafted in 1787. According to Taney, Dred Scott was the property of his owner, and property could not be taken from a person without due process of law. Donare cash.me/$tazadaqshah
More from this channel
-
9:54
The Strawman Trap: Government Claims Ownership at Your Birth
-
11:07
Unveiling the secret purpose behind driver's licenses
-
10:34
Unveiling the Dark Truth: Lawful Money vs. Legal Tender
-
12:29
Your Birth Certificate Isn't What You Think | The Federal Ownership Scheme
-
10:57
Government Collateral: Why You Don't Own Your Vehicle
-
6:42
You're Still a Slave and Don't Even Know It | UCC 1-207
-
15:00
Government Contract Deception Exposed: What They Don't Want You to Know
-
14:55
They get jurisdiction by contract, Jurisdiction is Authority