Tiger killed but no blame
244 views · Published 19 April 2016 · 2:29 · Indexed 19 October 2026
Channel: Tony Marano · 2016 · News & Politics
Recently in a Florida zoo a Malayan tiger killed a zoo keeper. However according to an article by The Associated Press reprinted in The Dallas Morning news the tiger is blameless for the killing. The article reports in part: “Konwiser was killed Friday by a 13-year-old male tiger….” Further in the article: “There has never been blame assigned to the wild Malayan tiger involved in this deadly incident.” The tiger killed but is not to be blamed. Huh? The beast is still at the zoo on display. How come the wild beast was not put down? Easy answer: - Political Correctness - Animal Rights - Liberalism Time was in the USA when a beast killed a human it was put down. Reason being once it kills a human it will continue. Tennessee in 1916 an elephant killed its’ trainer. The elephant was hanged using an industrial crane. However in twenty-first politically correct America no one is held accountable for their behavior be they human or beast. This happened at the Palm Beach Zoo and Conservation Society where Stacy Konwiser was killed by the blameless tiger. Article reference in this video: http://abc11.com/news/florida-zoo-to-reopen-after-deadly-tiger-attack/1296567/ Link to Texas Daddy store: http://texas-daddy.shop-pro.jp/ Tiger attack zoo keeper killed animal rights Texas Daddy vlog opinion politically correct political correctness liberalism
More from this channel
-
4:34
ABC's anti-Christian agenda is transparent
-
2:53
Truth in food labels? Not in the USA!
-
2:51
Sea Shepherd rust and bucket of bolts
-
4:15
Xinjiang Provence or East Turkestan in western China
-
3:28
South Koreans in Seoul protest and praise President Bush
-
4:19
WANTED three crew members of Sea Shepherd
-
4:23
Nancy Pelosi life long Roman Catholic or life long Democrat?
-
4:21
China tainted food continues