Autoplay Next video from Max length

Oil Spill Vs. Dispersants: Which is Worse?

2,989 views · Published 4 June 2010 · 9:37 · Indexed 25 September 2026

Channel: thetruthergirls · 2010 · News & Politics

leak could increase by 1/5
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/oil/7787852/Gulf-of-Mexico-oil-leak-could-increase-by-a-fifth.html

800000 gallons of dispersant already applied
http://www.louisianaweekly.com/news.php?viewStory=2862

oil spill threatens entire east side of N American continent. Dispersant used is highly toxic, can be absorbed into clouds and come back down as toxic rain.
http://presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=128113&sectionid=3510203

BP rejects hair booms, says they will sink. How can hair floating in water, being soaked in water and oil, sink?
http://www.takepart.com/news/2010/05/24/bp-wont-use-volunteer-constructed-hair-booms-to-clean-gulf-oil-spill

Video shows hair boom to be very effective and not sinking
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q0cL4GsSqw

the dispersants being used are produced by a company called "Nalco" which was recently aquired by Blackstone Group, Apollo Management L. P., and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners as a joint venture (how convenient) in 2003 (from JamiSteven)
http://www.nalco.com/aboutnalco/history.htm

haliburton not to be held responsible: shares jump as result of announcement
http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/halliburton-shares-soar-as-company-outlines-obligations-in-bp-oi/19500641/

haliburton buys major oil firefighting company Boots & Coots
http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/halliburton-snaps-up-boots-and-coots/19435689/

Oil Spill Vs. Dispersants: Which is Worse?

More from this channel