002 - Why Rational Persuasion is a Martial Art
2,178 views · Published 24 August 2016 · 21:00 · Indexed 26 September 2026
Channel: Kevin deLaplante · 2016 · Education
This is episode 002 of the Argument Ninja podcast! - The goals of critical thinking and how critical thinking differs from rational argumentation. - The ultimate purpose of learning a traditional martial art is not to win fights. - The problem for which the traditional martial arts was a solution. - The "martial environment" of critical thinking today - Why rational persuasion should be viewed as a martial art. - The distinction between rational argumentation and rational persuasion - An example: contradiction and consistency versus cognitive dissonance Quote: ““The warrior knows things that no one else knows, valuable things that can inform our understanding of what it means to live a good life, even for those of us lucky enough to never personally experience war or violence.“ For show notes, commentary, full transcripts, and to learn more about how to subscribe to the Argument Ninja podcast: http://argumentninja.com Learn more about the Critical Thinker Academy: http://criticalthinkeracademy.com Learn more about Kevin deLaplante: http://kevindelaplante.com Follow Kevin on Facebook: http://facebook.com/CriticalThnkerAcademy Follow Kevin on Twitter: http://twitter.com/kevindelaplante
More from this channel
-
3:27
Probability: The Restricted Conjunction Rule
-
3:00
The Gambler's Fallacy: Introduction (0/6)
-
6:28
Why Rewriting is Important (and why students don't think so)
-
7:33
What is Mindware?
-
10:36
Sam, Scott and The Philosopher/Sophist Spectrum (clip from Argument Ninja podcast 021)
-
12:41
The Deeper Philosophical Roots of Scott Adams' Enthusiasm for Persuasion and Trump (clip)
-
8:22
Double Induction and the Appeal to Nature (Critical Thinking About Science)
-
52:23
028 - Tribalism isn't the Problem