Did Gauquelin Prove astrology? Part 1
3,980 views · Published 5 May 2013 · 27:58 · Indexed 1 October 2026
Channel: Evidence-Based Vibrational Astrology · 2013 · Education
The research of Michel Gauquelin is highly controversial. He claimed to have demonstrated that astrology works. Skeptics claim that his research is flawed. Who is correct? By re-analyzing Gauquelin's data we can see that his findings are interesting but do NOT demonstrate that astrology produced a measurable effect. In other words, he did not prove astrology. Also, harmonic aspects, particularly between Sun and Saturn, were also found to be good predictors of vocation. The Sirius astrology software and R statistical software were used to do the analysis. Sirius is developed and copyrighted by Cosmic Patterns Software. The company website is http://www.AstroSoftware.com. R is available from this website: http://www.r-project.org/ The Rstudio user interface for R used in this video is available from http://www.rstudio.com. See http://www.astrosoftware.com/SiriusTutorialVideos.htm for a list of tutorial videos. Links to the two tutorial videos on my reanalysis of the Gauquelin research: Did Gauquelin Prove astrology? Part 1 https://youtu.be/ofNkm2UNtH8?si=n5MhpZcbbGFLDuvQ Did Gauquelin Prove astrology? Part 2 https://youtu.be/lNQ_6EIkjOk?si=q64BVAnRFErd2ZxY
More from this channel
-
8:43
Astrology: Science or Superstition? Part 2 of 6
-
6:08
An Investigation into Astrology, Part 1 of 4.
-
14:14
The Harmonic Basis of Arabic Parts, Composite Charts, and Critical Degrees
-
30:56
The Music of the Spheres and Harmonic Astrology: An Ancient Tradition
-
5:52
Sirius: Short Introduction to the User Interface
-
18:51
The Moon's Mean Node and True Node
-
24:02
Nakshatras, Navamsa Signs, and Padas
-
17:47
Composite Charts of 3 Or More Charts