Look Who it Was Random video

VidCon Adopts Copyright View Of Its Corporate Sponsor YouTube?

4,390 views · Published 27 June 2014 · 3:33 · Indexed 12 November 2026

Channel: LiberalViewer · 2014 · News & Politics

Watch on YouTube

VidCon adopts false YouTube copyright position?

More info on my 2010 VidCon copyright panel at http://bit.ly/1nJmcs1

Full video of 2010 VidCon copyright panel at http://bit.ly/1qzJWlj

Fred Von Lohmann's 2010 EFF article titled "YouTube's Content ID (C)ensorship Problem Illustrated" at http://bit.ly/1pUmL5z

CNET 2010 article on Google hiring Fred Von Lohmann titled "Tech champion, watchdog heads to Google" at http://cnet.co/UQlEsg

December 2013 video "YouTube's Content ID System SUCKS" from YourMovieSucksDotOrg channel at http://bit.ly/1pWKOzo

Community panel description:

202 | Moderated by Jon Bailey, Honest Movie Trailers

Panel: Jonathan Paula, JogWheel; Peter Hollens; Teri Karboonik, New Rights Media; Rian R. Bosak, Head of Network Operations at Fullscreen; Jake Watson, Producer and In-House Counsel at Corridor Digital

Join our panel of experts discussing how copyright is policed on YouTube, why the system is imperfect but necessary, and what to do when your content gets flagged (whether it should have or not).
See http://bit.ly/1rFo2wM


Industry panel description:

213 | Moderated by Joshua Cohen, Founder of Tubefilter and the Streamy Awards

Jonathan Paula, Jogwheel; Art Neill, Executive Director at New Media Rights; Brandon Martinez, CEO & Co-Founder of INDMUSIC; Rian R. Bosak, Head of Network Operations at Fullscreen; Adam Goldstein, Director of Business Development, ZEFR; Jake Watson, Producer and In-House Counsel at Corridor Digital; Annie Lin, Senior Counsel, Loudr

YouTube could not exist without a system for identifying and flagging copyright violations. But with a system that not only auto-flags, but auto-claims content that uses copyrighted material, the legality gets a lot grayer and the potential for abuse a lot higher. Is there a way for YouTube to account for fair use? Or is the TOS the judge and jury?
See http://bit.ly/Vsxfyv

More from this channel