Look Who it Was Random video

Nutra-NotSoSweet: Monsanto Biological Weapon

156 views · Published 20 September 2016 · 20:38 · Indexed 21 September 2026

Channel: Civil Disturbia · 2016 · Education

Watch on YouTube

Nutra-NOTsoSweet: 
Or, Monsanto's Aspartame Biological Weapon.
Call it MABW for short, call it evil, call it anything thing you friggin want to but, it's killing your children & it's killing you.
DOWNLOAD or VIEW:
15 page PDF accompanied with this video, Nutra-NOTsoSweet: Aspartame=Monsanto_Bio_Weapon https://www.dropbox.com/s/ur4fxgv2a9lya9k/Nutra-Sweet%3A%20A%20not%20so%20Sweet%20biological%20weapon..pdf?dl=0

SOURCES: 
http://www.mercola.com/article/aspartame/fraud.htm
http://www.nutrasweet.com/
http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/aspartame.asp
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/securit/addit/sweeten-edulcor/aspartame-eng.php

Aspartame -- History of Fraud and Deception.
Today we have "Nutra-Sweet", which is widely used in a plethora of consumables, despite a demonstrated neurological reaction in some people. In February 1996, it was decided to also use the product name "Benevia". It is estimated that as many as 20,000,000 people cannot metabolize phenylalimine, and this inability is
genetically inherited by children. The inability to metabolize phenylalinine can lead to mental retardation in children. This means a risk of retardation for millions of children. A multi-billion dollar enterprise, this substance is said to be "refined" from "natural" substances. Like other "refined" substances, it represents a health threat to the general public. No long term studies have been
performed to evaluate the physiological effects of this substance, yet the public is lead to believe it is absolutely safe. Technically, the chemical is called aspartame, and it was once on a Pentagon list of biowarfare chemicals submitted to Congress. 
Aspartame is in over 4,000 products worldwide and is consumed by over 200 million people in the United States alone. What follows is
a skeletal examination of the chronology related to aspartame. 
A more detailed chronology is given later in this chapter based on information provided to us by the Aspartame Consumer Safety Network.
Aspartame is produced by the G.D. Searle Company, founded in 1888 and located in Skokie, Illinois. Searle is now owned by others. It is about 200 times sweeter than the refined sugar that it is meant to replace, and it is known to erode intelligence and affect short-term memory. It is essentially a chemical weapon designed to impact populations en masse. It is an rDNA derivative made from two amino acids, L-phenylalanine, L-aspartic acid and methanol. Originally discovered during a search for an ulcer drug in 1966, it was "approved" by the FDA in 1974 as a "food additive".
Approval was followed by a retraction based on demonstrated public concern over the fact that the substance produced brain tumors in rats. According to the 1974 FDA task force set up to examine aspartame and G.D.Searle, "we have uncovered serious deficiencies in Searles operations and practices, which
undermine the basis for reliance on Searle's integrity in conducting high quality animal research to accurately determine the toxic potential of its products." The task force report concluded with the recommendation that G.D. Searle should face a Grand Jury "to identify more particularly the nature of the violations, and to identify all those responsible."
In 1976, an FDA "task force" brought into question all of G.D. Searle's aspartame testing procedures conducted between 1967 and 1975. The final FDAreport noted faulty and fraudulent product testing, knowingly misrepresented product testing, knowingly misrepresented findings, and instances of irrelevant
animal research. In other word, illegal criminal activity. Understandably scared, Searle officials sought to suppress the FDA findings and obstruct justice. They turned to Nixon and Ford administration operative Donald Rumsfeld and elected him "chairman of the Searle organization." In 1977, the Wall Street
Journal detailed the fact that Rumsfeld made efforts to "mend fences" by asking "what Searle could do" in the face of the changes.

More from this channel