Bogosity Podcast: 2014 Wrap-Up
345 views · Published 1 January 2015 · 1:02:06 · Indexed 31 October 2026
Channel: Shane Killian · 2015 · Education
Podcast page: http://podcast.bogosity.tv/bogosity-podcast-2014-wrap-up/ 2014 Year in Review 0:39 - Silver Cluon Recipients: 13 April Silver Cluon Award: James Wilson and Perry Willis https://secure.downsizedc.org/blog/the-untold-truth-about-the-mccutcheon-decision 26 May Silver Cluon Award: Tyler Vigen http://www.tylervigen.com/ 7 July Silver Cluon Award: The Electronic Frontier Foundation http://www.dailydot.com/politics/blimp-nsa-utah-eff-mass-surveillance/ 6 October Silver Cluon Award: Mark Daly and nVidia http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/09/18/debunked/ 8 December Silver Cluon Award: David Mazières, Eddie Kohler, and Peter Vamplew http://www.vox.com/2014/11/21/7259207/scientific-paper-scam Idiot of the Year Nominations: 12:25 - The WHO 14:28 - Matthew Yglesias 16:08 - The Obama Administration 19:58 - Food Babe http://foodbabe.com/2011/09/02/what-a-miracle-food-wheatgrass-bali/ Michael Shermer » Wheatgrass Juice & Folk Medicine http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/ 24:12 - Dr. Mehmet Oz Research confirms it: Dr. Oz dispenses a lot of medical advice with no scientific grounding http://qz.com/315813/research-confirms-it-dr-oz-dispenses-a-lot-of-medical-advice-with-no-scientific-grounding/ 26:06 - Jonathan's nomination: Lena Dunham http://www.dailydot.com/opinion/investigating-lena-dunham-sexual-abuse-claims/ 30:23 - Daniel's nomination: ShirtStorm Here There Be Dragons – Star Wars: The Expanded Trashcan http://radiodeadair.com/2014/05/13/here-there-be-dragons-star-wars-the-expanded-trashcan/ 36:17 - Charles's nomination: Sony 44:58 - Dave & Travis's nomination: Michael Mark Cohen http://gawker.com/douchebag-the-white-racial-slur-we-ve-all-been-waiti-1647954231 57:09 - Tim's nomination: Gaming Journalism 58:28 - Idiot of the Year “What do you think science is? There's nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. Which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?” —Steven Novella
